Anonymous ID: fe3751 Nov. 11, 2018, 9:13 p.m. No.3862804   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2933

>>3862769

what's funny about the way Scott goes about it is this:

If you've ever been in one of his live streams or on his twitter, around half of his audience follows Q. He proceeds to say, those that follow Q are getting hoax/manipulated/stupid ect. What does this say about Scott then? Why is half of his audience (in his belief) drawn to 'hoaxers' as he would say?

He basically calls himself a hoaxer. Which is true in some sense. He does intentionally attempt persuasion on his open periscope audience, often times pro Trump, but other times he does it to shove a massive blue pill down your throat. He is a creative thinker and worth listening to, but keep in mind he is attempting to persuade your thinking at all times, and not necessarily toward his own opinions (he states this openly in a few podcasts)

The only time you can fully trust it is his opinion/prediction is when he admits he put money on it, via a betting/booking site.

Anonymous ID: fe3751 Nov. 11, 2018, 9:23 p.m. No.3862915   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3862874

no it wouldn't change the existing deltas or frame of the qlock.

 

unless you are proposing adding a completely new delta, which would be the delta/distance between the offset + and the straight aligned +

Anonymous ID: fe3751 Nov. 11, 2018, 9:31 p.m. No.3862987   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3023

>>3862933

I think it's less to do with POTUS, and more to do with competing/business/economics.

 

If you're reading Q and keeping an open mind, researching on your own, you really don't need Scott to tell you what he thinks. This is less revenue/book sales/views for Scott. And since Q isn't a person, or business, it's not really something you can compete with naturally, since Q isn't making money off of our time being here. So he, like so many others that need your time and attention for money, resort to slandering the anonymity, or other aspects, instead of the ideas or research.

Anonymous ID: fe3751 Nov. 11, 2018, 9:36 p.m. No.3863023   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3141

>>3862987

I say this not because Scott needs money, I say it's about improving all those aspects (time/attention/book sales/views) because it adds to his persuasion factor. It is a very important factor in open audience persuasion. Being able to show you can make money off of just talking, typically is the strongest persuasion factor of all pundits/radioshows/podcasts/ect. That is where the term 'influencer' came from, It's the ability to crowd source an income from an audience through persuasion.