Ironically the patron saint of Nationalism is French
Someone get me the Jeanne D'arc in MAGA hat. I need it.
>That is why I don't mail my ballot in, but place it in the box at a local polling station.
>
>Broward county shows that that isn't even all that safe however.
>
>good times.
I'm in TX, which already has voter ID. But I should probably call the county anyways to be sure.
I think he meant a natural/grassroots thing by "organic". Instead it's a concerted, focused effort.
>"Shilling" is BY DEFINITION not "grassroots"– if it were grassroots, it wouldn't be shilling. Therefore, you are incorrect.
>
>What do you know about AI?
>
>I have to strong encourage those of you "anons" that try to attack and blindly deny discussion of AI that such responses aren't realistic. Humans are CURIOUS, and they have been hearing reports for a long time about AI. They aren't going to be fooled by attempts to pretend that such a thing is unlikely. Therefore, I recommend that the bots attempting to coverup the pervasiveness of AI here figure out a way to admit that there is a massive AI presence. You have no choice at this point– your stratagems are laughable. Thank you and Godspeed.
Even funnier is she calls the birther thing as racism… and then praises Hillary in the same breath.
When it was Hillary herself who first spread the Birther thing in the 2008 primaries.
Or rather it was Pedosta. The only Leftist who can meme really. Also started the Russian crap with Trump. He's good at making ideas stick somehow.
>Not even 300 posts in and zero research/digging getting done. Just a bunch of 20+ post ninnies having a pissing contest about bots and shills.
>
>Guess I'd better go back to lurking until Shareblue and JIDF HQ both catch fire in the most karmic of fashion.
I don't think there's much to research about FL. It's pozzed. It should be nuked from orbit.
At a certain point, one should just forward their report and recommend action. Some crimes have been researched to death. Now we want pain.
I won't be satisfied otherwise.
>493…494…495..496… (good luck…kek).
>
>I'm not the first to say this, but what I fear will happen is people, like me, who invested a lot of energy and hope - thinking it was a slow moving battle that required baby steps over a long period, will now feel used and dissillusioned.
>
>Think of addiction, specifically withdrawal. It's bad enough to not have what you need, but then there's the rebound effect. Discomfort hits twice (if not more) harder. Whater Q accomplished, it's now going to give back. Too much collateral damage. Not good.
I never invested in Q to that extent. I've been pissed since the Wikileaks. Merely follow Q because it's the only lead in getting anything done. If it turns out to not be true, I'll just be the same cynical self I was in 2016/2017
>The forged ballots didn't use the chemically secured paperstock we had made and the forgers will face 10yrs in prison if they don't 'decide' election night's counts were good. That would be about 50 people going to jail.
Why not just bust them anyways?
>Because "just busting" them sucks as a plot device.
>
>Letting them make complete assholes out of them, so people scream for their heads on a plate, is the answer.
>
>Then, arrest them all. There is no crime until they certify the fraud.
>
>Once that happens, 'then it is a crime.
I disagree personally. History until the 21st century was far more entertaining when it came to how you deal with enemies.
So much paperwork and lawyer/kikes determining the battlefield now.