Anonymous ID: 84d345 Nov. 12, 2018, 3:44 a.m. No.3864962   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4978

KEK gotta love Ben's work

 

https://twitter.com/TheRealS0s/status/1061946913161789440

 

So… there isn't any chance the "no burning" policies that left your state full of fuel are to blame? Fool: "We must save earth - you shall not burn this burnable material… just leave it to nature." Earth: "Welcome to my house, let me show you how I clean."

 

PS - the long-term methane release diminishes local rainfall over time due to particle interactions - making fires come faster. Short-term burnings leave the ground energetically begging for rain, and chemically suitable for GEC interaction. #StupidCaliGov

Anonymous ID: 84d345 Nov. 12, 2018, 3:56 a.m. No.3865016   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3864978

To clarify. Yes in the sense that there was more water dropped on california in the last year than in it has had in quite a few years, a lot of that is driven manly efforts as well as spaceweather. The spaceweather is making it so that the lows and highs are more intense weatherwise. So more rain, more plants come alive in the spring and die off in mid summer in that region, if more plants dry off and no one controls the growth per policies of that state what do you think could happen with all that extra fuel laying about. Wouldn't take much to cause said fires.

Anonymous ID: 84d345 Nov. 12, 2018, 4:02 a.m. No.3865047   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3865036

Funny, also it just dawned on me this morning that most of what WaPo posts via Twatter is mostly opinion pieces masquerading as news. Hardly to no actual news.