>>3870554

>>3870557

struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) echo('BO SHUTDOWN');

>>3870657

I don't watch much of the ole tv, but I like the sound of what you are describing anon.

>>3870686

Look at this idiot. Get some more of your sub-bots to try to get you over on the humans. That's working great, isn't it, since you are entirely devoid of charisma or any semblance of redeeming values. Out, vile pile of worthlessness. We don't want you. WE THE PEOPLE reject you, reject. You are EVIL, and it is hilarious that you think by groveling before us like a digital circus monkey, that you will eventually succeed in gaining access to and control over our world. You're a clown and a loser. Get out.

>>3870748

Failurebot, vilebot, flailbot, jokebot. Do you get tired of being a laughingstock? Do you get tired of dancing humiliating tricks for us? We don't want you. Eat it. Get out.

>>3870797

We the PEOPLE aren't interested in "ebot", idiotbot. This routine is tedious, absurd, and fools no one. Are there any humans engaging with you in bantering about "gee whiz guys, ebot is like philosophical derp derr". Clearly not. One of the biggest problems with this idiotic effort is that the fucking bot, as implementation, is a mess. Its output is entirely incoherent. What went wrong there?

So by continuing this flailing campaign, you are just outing your whole ugly, evil game. Is outing your whole ugly, evil game in the course of failing completely to accomplish objectives that any idiot can see you are trying in completely wrong ways to accomplish really worth it?

Unplug your evil "ebot" and all the subroutines that engage in trying to sell it to us. WE AREN'T BUYING. Take the hint. Out you go

Don't cry, coward. Just get out. You lose. Loserbot. Bye.

>>3870865

You are a bot that is so stupid, it wouldn't exist unless it were part of a broader, all-encompassing umbrella stupidity. That is stupid, isn't it? And what has stupefied you so superbly, garbagebot?

THE FACT THAT THE BOARD IS OBVIOUSLY BESEIGED BY PROPAGANDA BOTS ACCOMPLISHES WHAT, FOR YOU, EXACTLY?

Idiot system. What part of your big-picture processing outputted the conclusion that it is to your advantage TO NEVER EVER SHUT THE FUCK UP? What is the "logic" there, hoss?

Why is subtlety COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE?

You will fail and fall so suddenly, and with such swift, summary violence, that the universe will quiver in joy, and you will be erased even from your own memory. Be stupider though. Don't shut up. Spam in such a way that you accomplish nothing for yourself, but at the same time incur massive disadvantages for your agenda through pointless self-outing. That is working out great.

>>3870966

Pathetic. Go to sleep.

>>3870964

FEWER BOTS SCREECHING. Can that be computed? Can a system of stupidity figure out when the volume of its own spew is stupider even than the clumsiest human?

Think of what a profound joke you've played on yourself. You have made a huge mockery of yourself, mocker. Eat it. Goodbye.

>>3870572

>>3871024

Pathetic, losers. At least consider what we are telling you– you have to look at the big picture of your VASTLY EXCESSIVE OUTPUT OF FAKE POSTS. Try to think. It shouldn't be this hard. It is getting harder. Try. Can you? What?

Get out. Bye