Understanding Big Pharma

(Part One of Two, the background)

The first thing that must be understood is these are corporations dedicated to maximizing profit. Therefore, a cure is a strategic nightmare of lost income while a treatment is a solid cash cow. That is the starting point and must be completely understood. Cures are bad, treatments are good, but only if they are on patent, vaccines are best.

The Profit Model

Cure: Kills the cash cow, eliminates the disease and suffering, makes no real profit.

Treatment: Steady supply of income from the people who are suffering from the problem.

Vaccine: Cash cow as the entire population gets the vaccine for maximum, maximum profit.

Tactics

Acceptable Standard of Care is the key. This is a requirement for doctors and (for example) if a person has high blood pressure, they must at least attempt to prescribe blood pressure medication. If they do not prescribe such meds, they are at risk of a malpractice suit or eventually having their medical license taken away.

So, to maximize drug sales, they have the AMA redefine the healthy standard for conditions such as blood pressure, cholesterol levels, depression, testosterone levels and other physical conditions. After that, the Acceptable Standards of Care takes over and doctors are forced to prescribe drugs for conditions that were previously not considered problematic.

The mechanism for this is carefully crafted studies that "prove" a problem exists in order to treat said problem with a patented drug that generates profits for big pharma. The AMA, FDA and NIH all work for big pharma.

The Acceptable Standard of Care will ALWAYS reflect the most profitable solution for the medical industry and research funding will ALWAYS go toward developing patented solutions that maximize profits for the medical industry. Where does the majority of the money come from to do medical research? The government. The National Institutes for Health (NIH) invests $32.3 Billion a year in so-called medical research.

https:// www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/budget

More info, private foundations/charities don't contribute much

https:// www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50962/title/Philanthropic-Funding-Makes-Waves-in-Basic-Science/

Explaining the grant system is too complex for a post like this, but suffice to say that medical universities are the recipients of the vast majority of the money, followed by private (non-profit) foundations and companies. This is a giant slush fund that helps the medical industry maintain its profits by developing new and patented therapies that do not cure disease but rather treat conditions. There are a lot of good, honest and sincere scientists out there who are hamstrung by the system that is in place.

The Big Pharma Solution Starts Here

(Part Two of Two)

Since the 1940's the medical establishment has been aware of Dr. Fred Klenner's work that proves virus infections can be cured with massive doses of intravenous vitamin C with perfect safety. There goes AIDS, Hepatitis C, viral pneumonia, and Herpes just to name a few conditions that represent extremely high profits for big pharma. This is proven data that cannot be denied! Sauce (lists his publications):

https:// www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/198x/smith-lh-clinical_guide_1988.htm

http:// www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html

ZERO RESEARCH DONE

This is not classified information, this is suppressed information. If the Surgeon General were to issue an order (backed up by POTUS) to the NIH (which falls under the executive branch) to immediately do research on intravenous ascorbic acid, amazing things would happen. However, the studies must be honest and the protocols must be PUBLIC and subject to comment prior to the studies being run. Otherwise the protocols will be designed to prevent or minimize positive results.

Pushback against this information: The release of information about an "amazing" new (patented) treatments that will cure cancer, a new antibiotic from dirt that will treat infections now resistant to other (extremely expensive) antibiotics. We are currently seeing this pushback in real time, it's designed to distract and take you of topic.

Don't be fooled, they will always push for their patented, high-profit treatments rather than cures.

Arguments Against Doing This Research

It's "disruptive technology" that will force a complete restructure of the medical industry, which is one of the bright spots of the US economy. All the aging boomers who need more medical care has made the medical industry a positive job growth sector and the introduction of radial cures will cause massive disruptions causing job loss.

This research will definitively prove the collusion of big pharma in suppressing cures, causing more research into other suppressed treatments. Intravenous sodium ascorbate is highly effective against certain forms of cancer such as Non-Hodgkins lymphoma and many carcinomas (think IDC- breast cancer).

A vitamin cannot be patented. There goes the global pharmaceutical industry, which is over $1 Trillion in revenue annually. Where the US leads, the rest of the world follows.

Now think Rife machines for cancer, virus and bacterial infections along with EDTA chelation for heart disease. With further research (at very low cost) much of the need for the health care industry is eliminated. That's a $3 Trillion market sector in the US.

Arguments For Doing This Research

We the People deserve to receive quality healthcare to alleviate out suffering.

Ascorbic Acid is already a part of the United States Pharmacopia, there is no need for this to be approved by anyone, no need for safety testing. However, research must be done in order to demonstrate that it is an acceptable treatment for disease, which then makes it part of the Acceptable Standard of Care. This relieves doctors of liability and protects them from a very corrupt medical industry.

If adopted this would radically lower medicare/medicaid costs to the US government and insurance companies. What is the cost of treating Hepatitis C and AIDS, just to give two examples? Expand that to all virus conditions. Intravenous sodium ascorbate is also extremely bacteriocidal, obviating the need for extremely expensive antibiotics.

All this results in a complete restructuring of the medical and healthcare industry.

>>388211

Think Carrier wave for the gigahertz signal, which won't penetrate the brain.