>>3876490

OK, here are the pics of the "forgotten" boxes.

>>3862753 (from last night)

Let's say I buy the story about the grey bin labeled conspicuously as "PROVISIONAL BALLOT BOX".

Am I supposed to believe the orange box contains "campaign signs and orange cones" and needs to be secured with a tab like this (pic related)?

That sounds an awful lot like WJC and LL on the tarmac discussing "golf, Brexit and grandchildren."

>Shit, we got found out! OK, we can't spin the grey box with that sign on it, but what can we say might be in the orange box??

>>3876783

Day shift just as bad today. Maybe worse. I am not usually around during the day but was sickfagging today. Couldn't believe the number of fake Qs, "Q is a LARP", redtextfags etc.

>>3876782

Anyone seen a better view of the label on the top of the orange box?

The label on the side says "NO CAMPAIGNING" (an unusual label for a box supposedly containing campaign signs).

>>3876490

Note also Snipes's quote

>"I think it was a Budget rental cars"

Of course it was Avis and she would definitely have known that if the police had to be involved.

She is already downplaying importance and/or indicating a rusty memory.

>>3877060

Exactly.

So why would this orange box contain "campaign signs"?