Baker

Did you see these posts last bread?

>>3876048 lb, >>3876368 lb, >>3876037 lb, >>3876317 lb

We appreciate the hard work you do for us, but to dig in and hold firm to an error rather than admit a mistake is to compound the error. No shame in getting pulled in, we all do it until we learn to apply extra caution. This is why we rely on each other and require sauce, out of an abundance of caution. Please reconsider removing this notable, and not including any notable in the future which makes an unverified factual claim.

>>3876433 lb

>Seems to be legit imo…

>seems

>imo

With respect anon, factual claims are based on fact, not feels or opinion. We can't be citizen journalists if we sink to the same lack of standards as the "journalists" we're meant to replace.

>>3876629

>for the love of god, i'll remove it. jfc

Great, ty. You made the right call.

However the attitude implies you don't feel you were in error but you will cuck anyway. Respectfully suggest you rethink both positions. We just care that bakers apply journalistic standards. If the only way to get there is to reeeee when they're slackin' then so be it. But we prefer bakers to self-monitor for standards and to stand firm against muh notables bitching if it's unfounded. But we also know baking is hard work and bakers take a lot of shit, so again, we do thank you for the generous work.

>>3876903

>anons will take whatever standards they get

I'm sorry you feel that way, but this is untrue. Anons aren't cucks. We voice dissent and we fight for what we believe is right.

>dude i'm not a journalist. i volunteer here.

I do understand not wanting to take shit while working for free, but we have a base set of expectations of our bakers. We don't have an "anything goes" policy simply bc they volunteer. Not putting unsauced fact-based claims in notables is one of those expectations.

>>3877014

I've already made this argument in all my posts on this subject. It's about bakers being responsive to anons when they point out factual errors so we can maintain journalistic standards. We've been under heavy attack, and bakers have been bitched at heavily over notables. This can cause bakers to naturally callous up to legit anon feedback. It's important they don't do that, or our morale and cohesion will suffer. It is this larger issue that's important, more than the particular news on Cali.