>>3877973
I'd guess that most are trained to expect this. At least, they're not totally helpless like we are and they know they're working for the greater good. When you're single purpose of mind, you don't even try to figure it out. The military would be the best at it. At least, that's what I hope.
Shit, reference in >>3878022 should have been LB, sorry anons.
Of course they would. The public still thinks Mueller is out to get Trump. All they need is public perception to drag things out until they can control it.
From a DS standpoint:
If RM is "dirty," then anything he's touched is legally suspect and thrown out by even corrupt courts. If the DS is counting on him to be /theirguy/, i.e., comped for them, then any indictments against Trump and/or his team are immediately tossed.
From a Trump standpoint:
If RM is "dirty" then his exoneration of Trump is suspect, and we'll end up with a repeat.
In short, both sides need RM to be clean.
He is. Get used to it, because you're going to feel pretty shitty when it turns out that way if you haven't managed to work through the logic beforehand.
It's.All.For.Show.
They probably weren't blank. There's a legitimate reason to have blank ballots left over after an election. If they've been filled out, however, and the signatures don't match, then that's a different story.
1) Secret pardons.
2) A sudden drop of everything potentially results in riots, civil war, etc., which was deemed a poor outcome except as a last resort.
Instead, they plan out a cat and mouse game in which they control all the cards, precisely because they have everything. Sucks from our standpoint, but would any of you rather be a normie completely in the dark?
What knot? You don't have any argument other than "it's bullshit." Sounds to me like you're just a shill crybaby.
Wah, Orange man bad!
Go fuck yourself.
And there's no reason for Sherrif Israel to lie… none at all. It's much worse than just blank ballots running around, which can be chalked up to a mistake. If they've been filled out fraudulently, then can't explain that away.
WaPo. 24-hour fudge rule.
Q told us this in the beginning. Read the crumbs, FFS.
WaPo. "5 current and former WH officials." So, "sources," right? Some (probably all) of which already quit or got fired. Where have we heard that before?
They have no way of knowing how many there should be ahead of election day. Therefore simply having extra blank ballots on hand isn't sufficient to prove anything. It's simply not enough. It can easily be explained away (even if most people don't fall for it, only takes a few vocal morons). It MUST be more.
Things HAVE been dropping, however. That's the problem, it hasn't been enough to really sway opinion. All the information is out there. This leads us right back to what Q said… implement plan A (let them hang themselves, essentially), or plan B (full drop, essentially).