Anonymous ID: e22d5b Nov. 12, 2018, 11:59 p.m. No.3881483   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3881446

>>3881446

>Question: If voter fraud is proved, would there need to be a re-election?

 

Only for those proven to have won fraudulently. Whatever politician benefitted from the fraud should be arrested, too.

 

If the contender was non-fraudulent and won, they should keep their victory, no matter which party.

 

>They can't do a recount because ballots have been destroyed. How would this be handled?

 

The evidence has already been collected; Destroying the paper evidence only dug [them] deeper.