Due to the violence shilling last bread, I am reposting this.

I do not support violence or the use of force outside of the scope of the law, and no other real researcher will, either. Pic relates.

>>3886438

As long as you're talking about criminal penalties derived from prosecutions in Military tribunals, we are good :)

If you are talking about the physical protection of our borders from enemies by the Military, we are good :)

Any other usage is not condoned.

>>3886517

>>3886533

Federal prosecutions do not care about the rules of war..

The rule of Law is what saves the Republic.

We can agree to disagree. I'm not an activist. I'm a researcher that memes.

>>3886546

>Do not reply to shills. You keep failing at this.

Fuck you, pic relates.

>Lurk moar.

Suck a goat cock.

>>3886633

>>3886774

Acosta savaged.

>>3886805

HAM is easy to intercept.

Anyone can if they have a HF/VHF scanner.

I bet [they] didn't even encrypt it. Sure, packet radio, but who cares if the NSA has the root keys to everything to begin with

>>3886890

Oh hey, that's how the Steele dossier happened!

>>3886905

But him overpowering a woman intern to get his own way and break press room etiquette on national television, and making his entire profession look like implacable infants wasn't it?

>>3886916

>>3886916

>its illegal to encrypt anything on HAM radio.

fair enough, and also noted that you get that crims ignore laws

>all HAMS are self appointed hall monitors who think their ticket makes them federal agents…

Good. So distributed self-policing still works.

>>3886947

Welcome to 2018.

The Articles of Confederation were replaced with a legitimate government for several reasons ;)

The Constitution doesn't care about England.

>>3887040

Thanks for the heads up o7