Anonymous ID: bc1dbb Nov. 13, 2018, 3:07 p.m. No.3890607   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0636 >>0648

>>3890480

 

Q posted 53-47 twice

Once was during the Kavanaugh vote

Once was NOT!

Both times there was NO explanation.

Any meaning that you place on these numbers is your own, and NOBODY is under any obligation to agree with you.

Given your emotional outbursts I'm inclined to think you are an idiot who is incapable of reasoning logically.

 

Many of us have noted that Senate votes often, but not always, sum up to 100.

For instance in Q's Drop on 9 Oct 2018 - 6:42:13 PM

He said…

 

What was the SESSIONS SENATE CONF VOTE?

52-47

No. 175

Logical thinking v clickbait.

Q

 

Clearly sometimes Senators are absent or abstain from a vote.

 

We know that Mnuchin's confirmation was 53-47

And that the Saudi vote was 53-47

That makes 3 votes with 47 opposed. Are they all Dems?

Is the Senate voting consistent and predictable?

Anonymous ID: bc1dbb Nov. 13, 2018, 3:14 p.m. No.3890726   🗄️.is đź”—kun

12 Nov 2018 - 9:12:14 PM

53-47

Q

 

Q draws attention to Treasury Secretary Mnuchin. Could he mean, WATCH Treasury?

Because the very next day this happened…

 

Treasury Sanctions Key Hizballah, IRGC-QF Networks in Iraq

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm546

 

Iran's support networks in Iraq have been sanctioned.

 

Last similar Q drop was on 2 Oct 2018 - 12:31:13 PM

53-47

Q

 

And in the 4th of October…

 

Statement by Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin on New U.S. National Strategy for Counterterrorism

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm504

 

Beginning to see a pattern here? Don't let the shills control YOUR news cycle. Lots of things are happening that are not on CNN.