Thinking out loud:

1. An Argentinian sub goes missing.

2. Q mentions the "Hunt for Red October", but now calls it just "Red October", inferring that the "Hunt" is over.

http:// www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5216717/US-ends-hunt-missing-Argentine-submarine.html

1. The painting behind Bill Clinton / Kim Jong Un shows a giant wave destroying a city.

2. The US has tested a tsunami bomb back in 2013.

http:// www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/9774217/Tsunami-bomb-tested-off-New-Zealand-coast.html

1. There recently have been news articles stating that Russia has a tsunami bomb that could threaten the east coast of the US.

https:// www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/02/u-s-reverse-obama-decisions-catch-up-russia-china-rapidly-expanding-nuclear-capabilities-reverse-oba/302746002/

http:// www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/01/russia-can-launch-tsunami-against-us-nuclear-bombs-buried-ocean/

This is a crazy theory, but what if the missing Argentinian sub is used to park a tsunami bomb off the east coast so that Russia could be blamed for a direct attack on the US? If this sounds far-fetched, please don't waste any time on it. I don't want to derail the work going on now.

>>389694

Roger that. Could it be possible that the ARA San Juan could be parked in New York Harbor, then unleash a tsunami bomb on NY? Could 7 SEP 1776 (first submarine attack in history) also infer that this could be the first weaponized flooding?

Once again, if this is going down a dead end, then let's skip it.