anons need to reread cointel pro tactics: >>2322789
specifically "astroturfing consensus"
Learn to actually spot shills, and ignore them. Anons with questions, or 'black pills', or disagreement on theories, are not shills typically. That type of engagement is not beneficial in subverting analysis. Astro turfing is however. Learn the difference between astro turfing and an anon with a competing theory. If I'm being honest, it would be quite easy to astro turf most of any analysis going on the board, as most anons are doing it unknowningly at this point.