>>3890480 prev
Q posted 53-47 twice
Once was during the Kavanaugh vote
Once was NOT!
Both times there was NO explanation.
Any meaning that you place on these numbers is your own, and NOBODY is under any obligation to agree with you.
Given your emotional outbursts I'm inclined to think you are an idiot who is incapable of reasoning logically.
Many of us have noted that Senate votes often, but not always, sum up to 100.
For instance in Q's Drop on 9 Oct 2018 - 6:42:13 PM
He said…
What was the SESSIONS SENATE CONF VOTE?
52-47
No. 175
Logical thinking v clickbait.
Q
Clearly sometimes Senators are absent or abstain from a vote.
We know that Mnuchin's confirmation was 53-47
And that the Saudi vote was 53-47
That makes 3 votes with 47 opposed. Are they all Dems?
Is the Senate voting consistent and predictable?