"Think clock."
"Timestamps important."
"The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL."
"Wind the clock w/ all markers."
"On the clock"
"Connect the 'markers.'"
Need more?
Lol. How could it NOT have been before the clock was made? Think! ….
How else could Anons figure something Q-related out – you sure don't wanna learn, but only shill. Go away!
Didn't mean to say you are a shill – but think please: How can we figure something out before Q gives us clues?
Clockfags (most of them) are highly logical anons – so asking a question that is inconsistent in itself will throw them off all the time, and they will think you're just shilling … Sorry, didn't mean to turn you off. It's just that we (the clockfags) started our "business" because of the clues Q gave us ….
Apologies again. And I am well aware how long it took/how far we (the clockfags) have come … 'member the time when all things clock were "shills"?
Not that it would matter at all … but if we knew, we'd explain it to everyone!!!
We still don't know – that's part of the problem. We're still at trying it out and figuring what else might be in there, since all indications are that there is …
Sorry again! We're trying … ;)
Done deal. I'll try – might take me one or two days ….
>edificational purposes
Kek! I might not make a thread out of it, but likely a PDF with a couple of sections/chapters & examples. Will check that with the colleagues/residents in the clock bread, but it'll be instruction-like – I'll try!
Shills by now have figured that the clock is a thing, apparently … so I've seen enough clocks where I, personally, also thought that it's only useless lines drawn and connections made that have nothing to do with each other – that's another problem: to distinguish b/w what is plausible and what is not (given the fact that not all is known yet) ….
So I'll always go with "the simpler the better", and if more complicated, then at least there must be some plausible, topical/thematic "red line" connecting the things ….
Shills usually just draw lines w/o thematically and correctly connecting the posts …. takes a bit of experience, I guess (and sometimes I am wrong too) – but it must be logical and in some way consistent, otherwise likely it cannot be "Q".