>>3896433 prev bread

Damn I hate it when the catalog is busted, this is a cluster.

That Wikileaks email about Project Ivy is blowing my mind.

That thing ought to go viral.

I'd like to request urgent assistance from somebody familiar with the deep webm to see if they can find those two file attachments:

The DNC and the Four Pillars.pdf (245953 bytes)

DNC Project Ivy.pdf (1380128 bytes)

I am sitting here listening to that evil, worthless, traitor Hussein in the video and have been swearing at the computer at 06:00 Eastern time. Just hearing him go into black southern preacher mode makes my teeth clench.

https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/115971

Project Ivy is the Obama thing that Maxine Waters was running her fat ugly mouth about!!!

The key will be putting a foot up the stodgy Republican Party's ass and getting them up to speed on operations like this.

If they don't, they're screwed.

White hat alphabet, military intelligence, good guy lawyers, "Q":

This nation is depending on you for its very survival right now. There will be no second chance.

I pray to God you people have something up your sleeves and coming VERY soon, or the Republic is going to die a slow and painful death, and we will all have to watch and suffer with it while it dies.

Come on. Surprise us. You will have our love and admiration for a lifetime if you can pull this off.

Godspeed.

>>3897535

Related Maxine Waters' bloviating about Obama's database-to-end-all-databases:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28439/flashback-maxine-waters-brags-about-obamas-james-barrett

FLASHBACK: Maxine Waters Brags About Obama's Database With Info On 'Every Individual'

"That database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before."

ByJames Barrett

March 20, 2018

An exposé by The Guardian on the Trump-connected Cambridge Analytica firm's efforts to gather data on Facebook users has set off a media firestorm over the issue of creating digital profiles of people for the purposes of targeted campaigning. The only problem, as many have pointed out, is that the very same media now so concerned about such efforts repeatedly praised the Obama campaign for doing the same thing back in 2012.

In yet another soundbite she probably wishes she could get back, during President Obama's second term, Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters (CA) once touted Obama's massive database, which she described as having "information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before."

Her comment came during an interview on Roland Martin's "Washington Watch" in which Martin brought up the fact that the Obama-era would end in 2016, so minorities "better get what you can while he's there." Here was Waters' reply:

Well, you know, I don’t know. And I think some people are missing something here. The president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.

When conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh highlighted the clip on Monday, he noted that we mysteriously never heard Waters bring that glorious database up again and underscored the similarities with what Obama had done back in 2012 with what Cambridge Analytica is accused of doing in 2014.

Guardian's exposé on the firm, which was published Sunday, suggests that data obtained from an analytics group on 50 million Facebook users' profiles was used for targeted campaigning by the Trump campaign two years later. Cambridge Analytics denies the claim, maintaining that they did not use the data once Facebook complained that it was accessed in violation of its rules because the person who conducted the data mining initially claimed it was only for educational purposes.

In a series of tweets on Sunday, Carol Davidsen, former director of integration and media analytics for Obama for America, explained how the campaign was able to mine Facebook's data in a way that employees for the company suggested they "wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side."

"Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing," she wrote. "They came to [the] office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side."

"I worked on all of the data integration projects at OFA. This was the only one that felt creepy, even though we played by the rules, and didn’t do anything I felt was ugly, with the data," she added later. She also noted that she is "100% positive that Facebook activity recruits and staffs people that are on the other side."

Below is the first tweet in the series, in which she highlights a Time article praising the Obama campaign's data mining efforts:

An article written in 2012 about a project code named tärgus https://t.co/cuwy4MhkPm

— Carol Davidsen (@cld276) March 19, 2018

>>3897535

Early morning, angry and motivated dig on Project Ivy

This is the operating & voter contact model those jerks are using to STEAL THE ELECTIONS RIGHT NOW.

Republicans have GOT to get up to speed, or they're done.

http://swampland.time.com/2014/02/24/project-ivy-democrats-taking-obama-technology-down-ballot/

Docs: https://www.scribd.com/document/209059091/DNC-Project-Ivy

http://www.epolitics.com/2015/09/23/what-happened-to-project-ivy/

https://blog.ngpvan.com/news/icymi-votebuilder-foundation-dncs-new-project-ivy

"NGP VAN is the leading technology provider to Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations, offering clients an integrated platform of the best fundraising, organizing, and digital products. NGP VAN is credited widely as being a critical piece of the Democratic and progressive technology edge.

NGP VAN counts thousands of campaigns and organizations amongst its clients, including President Obama’s reelection, all the national Democratic committees, every Democratic Senator, most of the Democrats in the U.S. House, and thousands of Democratic campaigns, PACs and non-profits, and other organizations.

Publications like

, , and covered NGP VAN’s innovative product, writing "The potential power of Social Organizing is impressive."

https://www.businessinsider.com/the-democratic-partys-tech-startup-2014-2?op=1

" A fact sheet distributed by the DNC Tuesday identified the "four tools and strategies at the core of Project Ivy" — a "voter file and data warehouse," "analytics infrastructure," "field and marketing tools," and "training and fostering a culture that cultivates further technological innovations."

"The collective goal of these is simple — to take what we've learned and the tools built for the 2012 Obama Campaign and scale them so every Democratic campaign up and down the ballot can deliver our winning message to more voters, more effectively," the fact sheet said. "The DNC will invest millions of dollars in Project Ivy in 2014, and has dozens of full time staff dedicated to building, testing and implementing cutting edge technology to benefit campaigns across the country."

https://www.campaignsandelections.com/campaign-insider/ngp-van-touts-dnc-s-project-ivy

"The GOP this month launched Para Bellum Labs, its incubator project designed to help Republicans close the so-called technology gap. But the party's recent efforts drew ridicule from unnamed DNC sources. “They haven’t been able to reverse engineer what we did three years ago, let alone what we’ll do this year,” one DNC official taunted the GOP in Time.

The DNC said Project Ivy, which will have "dozens" of staff, will "take what we've learned and the tools built for the 2012 Obama Campaign and scale them so every Democratic campaign up and down the ballot can deliver [the party's message] more effectively." But making the Obama tools scaleable is easier said than done.

“That’s one of the big things we’re trying to do—scalability,” Matthew Holleque, a statistician who worked for Obama last year before co-founding BlueLabs, a data analytics firm, recently told C&E. “The Obama campaign was a massive organization and was a great place for a lot of innovation and testing and coming up with best practices. Now the challenge that we’re facing is how to bring that down to races of different sizes—statewide races, congressional races, even local races.”

According Dan Wagner, who founded Civis Analytics after going through both cycles with Obama, the question of scalability has already been answered, and that’s the reason why Obama-style data analytics is gaining more adherents. “In 2010, if you wanted analytics you needed lots of money, you needed a ton of resources,” he says. “In 2012, if you wanted [what the Obama campaign had] you needed to pay lots of money.”

Now, the technology is significantly cheaper, he says, pointing to a server that cost $20,000 in 2009, which now costs $100 on Amazon.com.

“The big thing this does is it lowers the barriers to entry for smaller candidates,” says Wagner."

>>3897600

Damn good, anon.

Anons could send this to their respective state Republican party chairs.

Worst thing that could happen is they already have it.

Those people gotta get up to speed.

My worry is that they're still using 1980-era campaign models.

That ain't gonna get it anymore.

Obviously Democrats aren't going to get any kind of legal blowback for the election shenanigans we're seeing.

Nobody has the balls to call them out for it, because as we all know, the Democrats will just have you murdered if you fuck with their program, and they have the Agency backing them up on that.

>>3897638

Lemme see if I'm understanding this correctly– Hussein had a ton of data his people had mined from the NSA, and turned it over to the DNC to exploit. The RNC had no such advantage to exploit.

Trump's election really was a freaking miracle.

We know that comparable funding is behind the RNC, and that is what buys the Big Data crunching and the constantly-updated political consulting that makes it all happen.

Just have to wonder if the "new" system is to do what Dems are doing:

– exploit every possible fuckup in the election system, focusing on slow-process votes (absentee, provisional, mail-in, etc)

– immediately contest the results

– hold press conferences in which candidate is belligerent and denies losing

– have a bunch of high powered lawyers ready to swoop down and file numerous lawsuits immediately following election

– promote candidates based solely on their sexual perversity, race, religion and overall weirdo factor

Because if that's the new normal, fine. They made the rules; let's see how they like playing by them.

We will have to abandon all our notions of decent sportsmanship, fair play, and any fear of being perceived a poor loser. We will simply have to become even worse poor losers, louder deniers and protesters, and more willing to wage lawfare than they are.

This is just shitty, but that's obviously what they want more than even food and sex. They want an unruly, lawless, crappy society.

>>3897698

EXACTLY

Republicans better lose their granny tea party attitude and start playing Mafia hardball

They're doing a shit job right now.

And same problem as Democrats, where the fuck are hot-headed Republicans between ages 30-50?

Fucking nursing home in DC right now

>>3897716

>The Dems were given preferential treatment from large tech companies to seed their dataset. They were GIVEN the whole map.

Would that not be grounds for massive lawsuits, if not revocation of their corporate status?

Anon here is from Georgia and was impressed by quality & amount of contact by Georgia GOP and Brian Kemp campaign, although had I note specifically gone to their sites and signed up with email and cell #, the experience would have been different.

I suspect Democrats had access to a much more aggressive system.

Using corporate technology to interfere with the normal operation of the U.S. government– wouldn't that be treason or sedition?

If any company have interfered with the US gov't during WWII or the Cold War, they'd have gotten destroyed over it.

Have not read full Carol Davidsen article yet, will do so.

>>3897725

Illegal corporate activity.

Lawsuit.

If Sessions had ever DONE anything, the cases would be in process already.

I'll trust Sessions when I see that he's ever actually lifted a finger, but not yet.

Sorry, am a jaded, cynical old anon who has seen 35 years of shit in the business world, and I don't trust ANYBODY.

>>3897749

Fine, Scooter.

Let me borrow those special glasses you have that only, what, 4 other people have.

The window of opportunity for happenings is closing.

Show me some proof that Republicans have learned anything at all from the Midterms election shitshow, and tell me why you think things will be one goddamn bit different in November 2020.

I'll wait.

>>3897764

Unfortunately, life isn't fair.

Millions of lawyers can't change that.

>>3897776

>>3897777

Have seen at least two people suggest that the Google/China debacle was white hats at work.

Maybe we'll find out one day, but I think it's much much worse than Google is letting on yet.

Have wondered all night if the Google/China mess and the election mess are connected, because the timing is really suspicious.

With any luck, the good guys have pushed the Democrats/globalists so persistently for so long that they'll get tired, lose focus and screw up. That's the way it is with sports; outlast your opponent, and he'll make mistakes out of sheer fatigue.

Plus, Democrats are stupid, which adds to the potential for mistakes.

>>3897777

Wait, Cloudflare is the common denominator in both the election fraud AND the China debacle?

Holy shit

CLOUDFLARE

>>3897797

Little man, the men in my family live annoying long. Long enough to be pains in the ass to everybody younger than them who have to deal with their attitude, and that is exactly what I plan to do, too.

They made me miserable, and I'm damn sure gonna return the favor.

>>3897841

Am already wondering if Google's PR disaster (which they're trying desperately to hide) is not at least partially to blame for the giant Dow Jones dive this week.

Yeah, Bush Jr and Obama's foreign policy laid out the welcome mat for China, for all that sweet sweet cash. They and their friends all got rich. Mr. Dianne Feinstein was a particularly fortunate recipient of the Chinese party favors. Lucky Dicky Blum.

If Trump can somehow nuke the election fraud and get reelected in 2020, he'll have the opportunity to clean out academia. Gawd does it need it. Stanford, for one example, is basically Chinese summer camp and where Steve Phillips, Corey Booker, Susan Sandler, and a bunch of others got their Mao Tse-Tung indoctrination. The Ivies and all major institutions have a bad case of communism syphilis, too.

Listening to this right now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mehDPfrKs7A

Joe Sullivan & Cloudflare both deserve blistering digs

>>3897888

Yeah, let me know how you feel when your adult son manhandles you and cusses you out because he's on god-knows-what. Sick of the abuse.

See how warm and fuzzy you feel.