good catch anon. then the explanation for the dem win for Sen is not necessarily fraud (though it could be). it is also quite possible that the difference in results between sen and gov is the incumbency of Ducey, combined with mcsally starting way behind in polling/name recognition.
> I understand this logically but emotionally dam it’s hard to be patient.
i think that plenty of us have those emotions anon. but it is like organic weight gain/loss. if you gain a huge amount of weight over a long period of time due to structurally poor lifestyle habits, then you can't expect to lose that weight overnight and keep it off. generally takes roughly the same amount of time living well to get rid of the weight that it took to gain it. we are in an analagous situation. what i fail to understand is the constant depression. as we "lose" all the unhealthy shit one should generally start feeling incrementally better. going for the quick fix because one wants all that good feeling at once is a fundamentally broken plan both in weight loss and in swamp draining.
congrats anon….you have shill doppelgangers trying to impersonate you which is actually rather entertaining….last bread as well..
i see you shill fuckers and want to remind you that there is but one y=x anon.
>3897940
>McSally had less votes in every county than Ducey (image).
looking more closely, it looks to me like mcsally won several counties (cochise, yuma, navajo, pinal etc….)…..
however, spot checking a few and cross referencing with the gov race it looks to me like the delta between gov and senate is +/-9%. on a per county basis.
no time to do a full calculation and presentation but it sure looks to me like the swing is standard per county….which indicates serious automated fuckery in my mind…..(i took repub votes gov divided by total gov votes minus repub votes sen divided by total sen votes ….and got 9% in several counties). impossible to be organic (if my calc proves correct) unless the demographics per county are indentical or there is some other massive coincidence like cancelling differences in the domegraphics across counties.
>Phonefagging so cant do full analysis. Green dots by Ducey or McSally based on who got more votes. In all cases Ducey had more votes. Appears that variance is 10-20%.
okay, agreed. the green dots are clear. i was reading my own thoughts into your original post which is certain to cause confusion.
I am looking at the percentage change in repub votes from the gov race to the sen race. and there I continue to get +/- 9% fewer repub votes in the sen race on a per county level.