>>3897497 lb
Hive mind at it again - was typing this up and saw this notable - we need memes at the ready
DEEP FAKES
First introduced to normies in May with the headline “What to Watch for in the Coming ‘Wave’ of Deep Fake Videos”
https://gijn.org/2018/05/28/what-to-watch-for-in-the-coming-wave-of-deep-fake-videos/
>”Tools that can flag potential “deep fakes” are almost non-existent right now”
>journalists are stuck with what they’ve always relied on — critical thinking. Backgrounding, finding corroborating evidence, and, most importantly, doing plain old-fashioned reporting is always the best way to approach a sketchy source
Yeah, right. Journalists are going to tell us the truth? LMAO. And they were stupid enough to use Obama in their marketing video - SMH
But, now the push is ramping up in the MSM. Most of this has been in notables over the last month, but compiling here for a reminder/clarity on whats coming.
October - YT goes down because of some pedo ASMR vid(?halfchan theory), Judical Watch released an article on the Weiner laptop, and major officials start tweeting about fake pictures and videos. Within days, WSJ and Wired have articles about “deep fakes”
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/189688334/
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/189707437
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-fbi-documents-detail-weiner-laptop-clinton-email-find-just-before-the-2016-election/
https://www.wired.com/story/these-new-tricks-can-outsmart-deepfake-videosfor-now/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/deepfake-videos-are-ruining-lives-is-democracy-next-1539595787
November - The same cycle just repeated itself in the last week with the Jim Acosta mess. First CNN cries that the video was faked, then the New Yorker and The Guardian both release articles about “deep fakes” this week. BBC releases vid (see pb notable above)
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/12/deep-fakes-fake-news-truth
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/11/12/in-the-age-of-ai-is-seeing-still-believing
Key quotes to show the set-up
>a computer-generated replication of a person,saying or doing things they have never said or done.
>”For instance, a GAN can look at thousands of photos of Barack Obama, and then produce a new photo that approximates those photos without being an exact copy of any one of them, as if it has come up with an entirely new portrait of the former president not yet taken.”
And my favorite
>“I’m starting to see how a well-timed deep fake could very well disrupt the democratic process.”
We all know (((they))) are prepping the public for the Hillary vid and the Obama pic. This is clearly a set-up. Autists can see the truth, but how do we help the normies? Do we have memes at the ready? I’m not a VideoAnon, so I need some ammunition to help make my memes. We know the Hussein pic and the HRC Vid are coming, have we prepared?
Qpost 1049 – Hussein AK47
Qpost 854 – raw HRC vid