>>3898658 Imagine a world without the loudmouth nothing Hogg, promoted to instant superstardom by the beast. Wind him up, pull the string and watch him spew BS.
Baker notable
>>3898659 PG&E Plunged 20% after Disclosing Electric Incident Before Camp Fire
>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/14/pge-plunges-20percent-after-disclosing-an-electric-incident-just-before-fire.html
Screenshot attached. If found liable, said their insurance is insufficient to cover damages.
.
>>3898665 If you see anybody who terms their own teachings as "Wisdom", run don't walk, in the opposite direction. Flee.
The customary "blue slip" Senators' approval of federal judicial nominees for their state may have applied as a courtesy in an era where
(1) little was known about judicial nominees outside of people local to that state – the era before the internet made all information widely available and
(2) collegiality and cooperation prevailed.
We are in a different era now.
I don't see why there should be any expectation that POTUS would consult with blue-state senators who are essentially enemies.
Let him select judicial nominees who will restore the rule of law.
I approve.
>Who controls elected leaders?
>Who do elected leaders report to?
>Pickle.
Pickle → "P"
I don't know.
Just noticing the initial letter.
Don't want to start a "P" slide.
Just re_reading crumbs.
That is a pretty good question though.
Who do elected leaders report to?
Question hierarchies.
Who's on top?
Outside of the formal, publicly-known command structure?
Who?
I like the idea of heavily taxing purchases of ad-time on mass media.
(Although I don't consume mass media myself.)
Also like the idea of breaking up the MSM, but even that doesn't far enough to rein in their social control of the "narrative."
>Now, we know that things got worse after that law was passed allowing the US Government to spend money on certain types of propaganda that they were not allowed to do before.
Could the Obama-era "allow government to publish propaganda" law be turned on its head and used to fix the situation? It was unethical then; would using it to fix things be unethical now? The law should be removed from the books so it cannot be abused again.
Information moves too fast. People cannot digest. They are not given time to think deeply, and the sheer volume information flow trains them not to think deeply.
How do we reverse this trend?
People who used to write on parchment with quill pen and ink thought before putting thoughts to paper. Look at Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, other deep thinkers of American history.
What are we going to do about this? I'm not advocating a return to quill pens and inkwells. But something has to change. Our society has been on a suicide course.