Anonymous ID: d5d4dd Nov. 14, 2018, 9:49 a.m. No.3900880   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3900116

 

>>3899869 pb

 

You know, it is possible that, in some given state, there can be a popular GOP figure that gets a lot of votes, and a popular Democrat figure that also gets a lot of votes.

 

You should look closely at the vote, and not merely say that some sort of change = fraud.

 

No doubt, there definitely could be fraud there, but numbers being different from one candidate to another could mean, D Sen is from Maricopa.

 

Q didn't give any data that look on the face of it as being screwy, The Arizona data says, R Gov is very popular in Maricopa, and D Sen is slightly more popular in Maricopa.

 

Q refers to a "vote swing", but it seems to just say that R Gov is X popular and D Sen is Y popular. There seems to be some sort of completely wrong and even surprisingly stupid coming from our leader Q theory that all the GOP in the same geographical area should get the same amount of votes no matter who they are, how famous, and popular and well liked they are, and where exactly they live.

 

I don't really know all that much about these candidates, but it would be interesting to know where these candidates are from, and if any of those candidates are more famous or p opular than the other one. Sometimes when an incumbent is popular, the other party doesn't put its top talent up against the incumbent, and the incumbent crushes it. But when there's an open seat (and the Senate race was an open seat) both parties put top talent up there, because both sides see it as a winnable race.

 

Arizona - I'd look at the border counties. I'd look at the number of votes in each of the precincts in 2018, 16, 14, 12, etc and just see if there are any weird spikes or anomalies. I'm thinking illegal alien voting there.

 

I'll go do research here, real quick.

 

Ok R Gov - Incumbent. People know him, he's the governor, the Dems aren't running their best against him. He expanded his margin of victory this year. This is all to be expected. 56/42 win for Ducey. About Garcia - "currently works as an associate professor at ASU's Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College." Maybe, here, Ducey is a stronger candidate than Garcia?

 

Consider too, that Maricopa county in Arizona was over half the vote. Phoenix is there. Ducey got 56 in Maricopa and 56 in Arizona. The Dem Senator got around 50 in Maricopa and a little less than that state wide. There was about 6% in Maricopa and about 6% statewide that voted R Gov and D Sen. This isn't a shocking as you would think with an Incumbent R Gov and a open Senate seat.

 

In addition, Q has his numbers wrong with R Gov and Maricopa. I just checked the NYT map, and these are the numbers. My math might be off by a little, but that 325 is way off.

 

Senate - D wins AZ by 38K

D wins Maricopa by 38K

 

Governor - R wins AZ by 327K

R wins Maricopa by 184K

 

There might be fraud, there might be illegal aliens voting. But the numbers that Q was passing along were wrong, and they aren't that screwy on the face to begin with.