A judge has ordered limited release of docket information on wiretaps (related to the cases discussed). Dockets are the clerks' notes about a case, they are generally limited to the date something is filed and any action, e.g., "01/10/2017 Application and Warrant filed and signed by Judge X" is docket information.
Does that answer your query?
JW is saying that the unintended consequence of Acosta/CNN lawsuit (if the court accepts CNN's argument) is that ANY AMERICAN media from ANYWHERE has a 1st amendment right to access to POTUS including the WH press pool and AF1 press pool.
I agree. JW, however, is taking the logical extension of CNN's stupid argument.
Right, it's ridiculous as JW's tweet demonstrates very well.