Supervisors of Election perform a ministerial duty.
They follow statutes enacted by the Legislature. Everyone knows the rules prior to the contest (the election).
The rules can not be changed during the contest. Whether those rules are “fair” or not is immaterial – those rules were agreed to when persons became candidates for election.
Now Democrats who lost the contest are in court challenging statutes and seeking retroactive remedy. These persons need to be thrown out of court with prejudice and fined.
You knew the rules. You agreed to the rules. You don’t change the rules because you lost.
If you want to change the statutes, fine. Do so in the future.
If a judge intrudes on the Legislature’s unique authority to define statutes governing their administrators conduct of elections that judge should be removed from the bench. He is not a Legislator. His solitary “wisdom” is necessarily inferior to that of the many who comprise the Legislature.
The only question which can be considered is whether the administrator (SoE) followed statute. If they did not then they should be charged according to statute. If that “disenfranchises” some, that’s unfortunate but there is no remedy that does not involve guessing. Perhaps the penalty for SoE’s who violate law should be increased, perhaps to felony or in some cases capital offenses.
For example, Snipes’ butchery of the election is a direct assault on Florida’s government, Florida’s representation in the U.S. Senate, and each and every citizen of Florida.