Anonymous ID: d78b48 Nov. 14, 2018, 12:13 p.m. No.3902681   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2684 >>2709

TY Baker!!!

 

>>3901883 (lb)

>>3902149 (lb)

>>3902285 (lb)

Anons need to ask themselves a question. How many lawsuits has Donald Trump been in ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

 

>Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150.

 

So, ~3500 lawsuits. OK. So, would that make DJT, perhaps, one of the most experienced persons in a court of law in the US? Think.

 

>Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court.

Impressive. That's a lot of visibility in the Federal Court System. Lots of experience, no? Here's another nifty list to keep handy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

As of November 13, 2018, the United States Senate has confirmed:

84 Article III judges

2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court

29 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals

53 judges for the United States District Courts

There are currently 70 nominations to Article III courts awaiting Senate action including:

12 for the Courts of Appeals

56 for the District Courts

2 for the Court of International Trade

 

There are currently 11 vacancies on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

111 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts

2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade

20 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump's first term (4 for the Courts of Appeals and 16 for District Courts).

 

Trump has not made any recess appointments to the federal courts.

In terms of Article I courts, as of August 28, 2018, the Senate has confirmed:

7 judges

including:

2 for the United States Tax Court

4 for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

1 for the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

 

There are currently 8 nominations to Article I courts awaiting Senate action including:

3 for the United States Court of Federal Claims

4 for the Tax Court and

1 for the United States Court of Military Commission Review.

 

Trump knows what's at stake. He has over 3500 reasons to make the picks he makes, and making them with the highest level of scrutiny of any POTUS before him.

 

Watch this:

>Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.

Wait, what?

(covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.

<double-take.jpg

 

Hmmm. Interdasting.

>In about 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump. In hundreds more, cases ended with the available public record unclear about the resolution.[1] Where there was a clear resolution, Trump won 451 times, and lost 38.[4]

OK, so Trump, as a defendant, has lost 38 times in a court of law, EVER. Winning percentage? ~98%. As a DEFENDANT.

 

The wiki doesn't go into details on his victories/losses as a plaintiff, but let's just assume he's probably got a pretty good track record.

 

1 of 2

Anonymous ID: d78b48 Nov. 14, 2018, 12:13 p.m. No.3902684   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3902681

 

Q post 1351:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1392388.html#1392849

Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 62bbb0 No.1392849 📁

May 12 2018 23:59:49 (EST)

BBE02D2A-488C-49B5-8B89-F….jpeg

Sealed indictments.

“An indictment is a formal accusation against one or more defendants, charging them with one or more crimes. In the federal criminal system, the indictment is the principal method by which a prosecutor initiates criminal proceedings.”

What happens if FED [criminal] indictments are brought forth to a corrupt FBI / DOJ / FED Judge?

 

Now, we all know that POTUS isn't going to just go after them and lock them all up without a good trap. Reference the judges list above. In order to get a dangerous animal, you have to trap it. How do you make that work? You gotta get the animal to walk into the trap.

 

Read this again:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1215291.html#1215845

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📁

Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)

Cohen raid by FBI?

RR signed off?

What other docs were collected?

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?

Who has everything?

Methods which info collected/ obtained?

Admissible in the court of law?

Insert Rudy.

First public statement.

“It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html📁

Think resignations.

Who has the POWER?

If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?

Why are we here?

Public forum.

World watching.

Sharing of intel to bad actors?

Purpose?

Planned?

Q

 

Every detail accounted for, right? How many years/decades in the making? This whole thing, the cabal, the foundations, the MSM, MOS and elections/ABCs, corrupt politicians, traitors, NXIVM, Hollywood, etc.; it's all going down in the courts. All. Of. It. Televised for the whole world to see.

 

The actors on stage are doing a fantastic job of taking the whole outfit and leading them right into a trap. Some of these actors are likely just that; actors. Regardless, the end result is going to be the same.

 

Ever wonder what's taking so long with the Trump Foundation case that Cohen is supposed to testify in with the New York State AG? How long does a court case like this normally take? Think.

 

The worse it looks for POTUS, the better.

 

2 of 2

Anonymous ID: d78b48 Nov. 14, 2018, 12:41 p.m. No.3903010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3902820

I think it's a bit more complicated than that, anon. Many of these posts could probably tie into CA in one way or another, sure. But there are correlations all over the freaking place. POTUS really is a complicated fella.

 

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/972828.html#973651

>Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: d9b428 No.973651 📁

>Apr 9 2018 18:36:08 (EST)

 

> Anonymous ID: 675dd2 No.973608 📁

> Apr 9 2018 18:34:18 (EST)

> >>973183

> Did anons ever figure out what Q meant with >the "BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - >THE START"

> Was this Syria FF?

 

>>973608

>Finally.

>Chemicals.

>Learn our comms.

>Q

 

Complicated.