>>3903731 lb
>They have soyboy face.
What exactly do you mean by soyboy face?
Is it the expression on their face that you find looks weak and unmasculine?
Is it a nutritional deficiency that causes weak and flabby facial skin?
Is it a lack of exercise causing a sallow unhealthy appearance?
Is it that they "unmasculine"?
These are stock photos. I'm trying to find photos of people who look healthy and happy.
Not leering or sickly or weak.
There are not very many photos of lumberjacks, miners, fishermen, farmers, cattlemen, or people who spend their lives out of doors doing physical labor. These are important jobs but do not constitute the majority of the American workforce anymore. Have you ever looked up what are the most common jobs and occupations? I have.
I believe I am not of your generation.
Therefore, any specifics you will give, about facial characteristics that you see as desirable in male photos, would help a lot.
Just saying "oh they're soyboys" is not very helpful. All it tells me is that there's something about some of the photos, I don't know which ones precisely, that bothers you. You think some of the males look effeminate.
Is that it?
Express yourself. You can type. A 4-word phrase -- even if repeated -- is not sufficient to communicate your understanding into my mind.