>>3903985 LBLBLB
yeah saw em RIGHT UP FRONT
coincidence? look at actual DOJ summary that gives the dates i posted
also note my main post calling out the slide was not inc in this bread notables although called out by anons for such
coincidence again?
odds and ends doesnt change my opinion
remember a demtard was behind this release
cant recall which one it was in the original post a couple breads back
RE- POSTING FROM LB
anons and BAKER
lawfag here
THIS AI SLIDE
these are real documents reflecting real event but NOT the ones the shitposters lead you to and to WASTE YOUR TIME
these docs in and of themselves are rlevant and significant for one reason and one reason ONLY
that is - they are preliminary declas crumbs that show many warrants FROM THE DS during the entire active SPYGATE period
LOOK at the dates - that is 2008-2017
further the documents show request for a variety of electroninc communications which would SUPPORT ACCUSATIONS OF VIOLATIONS OF VARIOUS ACTS TAKEN OR TO BE TAKEN BY POTUS UNDER SELECTED STATUTORY AUTHORIZATIONS GIVEN TO POTUS
in other words LEO alleged probable cause that there was violations by POTUS or POTUS ELECT
the warrants wanted evidence of this
again this is at best a prelim to DECLAS of the actual fraudulent warrants and spygate activities all the way back to 2008
IMO DIGS ON THIS WILL NOT AVAIL US OF USEFUL INFORMATION and the continued posting of this fake news supports my opinion
already request replies to such ang got NADA
further support for my opinion
Lawfag here
there are certainly many greedy lawyers BUT not nearly as many as you think
they work in a corrupt system just like doctors
get out you say? well that is tough after years of school and personal investment and $1000K debt when you learn LATER about the corruption
then what?
as to conflicts those can always be waived so your statement is not accurate
who is the "client" of a govt lawyer?
the govt
ez to waive if you have control
i like it