>>392688

>>392670

Programming subjects was an extension of the MKULTRA initial project and came under project Monarch:

https:// medium.com/@sebastianedward/mk-ultra-project-monarch-and-julian-assange-ad2aa42ba1a4

https:// www.counterpunch.org/2017/11/17/the-cias-house-of-horrors-the-abominable-dr-gottlieb/

It involves breaking down the mind through extreme trauma (pain & sexual abuse) until the psyche shatters and an underlying personality is formed, exposed and is capable of being programmed. There was a considerable amount of development of this technique, horrendously, from the Nazi-initiated area of research via operation Paperclip into the UK with one of the most notorious and prolific practitioners, Dr Green around the US (and other countries I imagine).

This became a rather sophisticated process and there are many MKUltra / Monarch 'survivors' that have been broken and subjected to ritual sexual abuse who are now attempting to address their horrifically painful past and rebuild their lives. It's a bit tricky as there is meant to be a self-destruct / suicide command in there which activates when the memory of the training starts to become accessible to the 'normal' person's consciousness.

>>390963

So a suitable subject is identified, and likely involuntarily subjected to 'therapy' in an institution >>392740; then Q goes on to state:

'THERAPY' takes [x] to break the mind into a functional/programmable device.

Then:

Ability to use frequencies [incoming sig]/modify/code/program over 'x' period [designate] mobile phone to 'control' target subject.

So the rest of the programming Q suggests can be done remotely via the mobile phone.

The drugs that these subjects might be on I doubt would be something as uncontrollable as strong SSRI's as these can make the subject suicidal and / or uncontrollable, I would suggest that it would be something a little more innocuous that renders the subject susceptible, or maybe drugs aren't required for the further programming. Q says that this is at the highest classification and so I seriously doubt we would find anecdotal evidence on the net, Patents are the only area that I can think of to follow, both for the technology and for the drugs. Laboratory trials and perhaps peer-reviewed papers maybe?

I presume it would be more 'acceptable' to do this inside an institution that has been tied to some of the Monarch stuff before, as any regular mental health workers I imagine react adversely to the patient's howls of agony, terror and misery…

>>393962

Yeah it's pretty bad. i think, from what i've seen, it would be best to find a specialist who works solely in this area should you come across someone who has been affected; mistakes in prying or triggering would be dangerous, traumatic at the very least.

>>394164

easily

>>395791

yes, mengel i think