>>3909288 (lb)

Just my observation... Science should be simple and repeatable at any scale. The scientific method is hypothesis -experiment -> results. Those results either prove or disprove the hypothesis which is you conclusion. I'm only saying it's against laws of nature, not by what some scientist says, but by what you or I could reproduce by our own experiment.

>>3909289 (lb)

Absolutely not. In fact I think that "scientist" are used as the scape goat to propagate lies and force us to believe a narrative because "muh science"

Gravity for example is still only a theory. There are effects that we observe but they can't be proven by identifying what the force actually is. In fact I believe that the effects of "gravity" can better be explained (and better yet tested by experiment by you or me at any scale) by the laws of density.

Even more so "gravity" has theorized based Newtown who a) had to invent an entire new down of math (calculus) so that his answers proceed right and b) was a Freemason. He also based his theory of off Galileo who was also a Freemason and changed the entire human perspective on planetary orbit. Modern "science" is only 500 years old and ALOT of it can't even be proven by simple experiment.

Long story short, I know we don't know. And that to me is one if the biggest things that pisses me off about these elites/cabal/Satanists is how much of our world has TRULY been hidden from us over these hundreds if not thousands not years