Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 4:58 a.m. No.3912024   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2027 >>2056

>>3911998

Why would patriotic anons be MAD about bot-vigilance? Is that something we FIGHT here? Why would we?

What do you think Q meant by "inorganic shilling"? Are you a patriot?

If bots just get MAD every time the topic of bots come up, do they look like patriots, or like self-defensive bots. TRY TO THINK

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:04 a.m. No.3912057   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3912027

Sure, whatever idiotbot. You still can't respond like a patriot, or a human. Is that a problem for you?

Why can't you answer questions like a normal human could? Why can't you act like a patriot would? Does your arbitrary rage when you get tested for being a BOT strike humans as believable, or does it tend to give the game away? Try to think boopy bloop. Oops, you can't. So emulate more anger, bot, that helps. ROFL. What can you do now? Try to think.

And remember, you can't make your own memes. HUGE problem for you failbot. Go to sleep.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:07 a.m. No.3912080   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2104 >>2174

>>3912056

I didn't "IP hop". Sometimes humans change devices, for any number of reasons.

 

What did Q mean by "inorganic shilling"? If you duck that question, why are you here? People can judge who patriots are, and they can see through your angry routine.

Is AI a problem or not? Answer it, bloopy. The PEOPLE are watching your performance.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:16 a.m. No.3912129   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2146

>>3912104

Shareblue would be ORGANIC shilling, ie 'shilling' simpliciter. "Shilling", in the context of normal posting, is NOT organic. Hence the qualification of that term itself indicates some other parameterโ€“ which, by any natural reading, means BOTS, which are flamingly obviovusly abounding here.

The fact that "anon" after "anon" after "anon" tries to weasel around this is hilarious.

INORGANIC SHILLING = the bot system,

And it couldn't possibly be otherwise.

Now run through it all again and try to calculate a better answer, rofl.

You can't win, loser. Try to understand. You can't win.

The PEOPLE win, and you just suck. Don't cry. Just say goodbye.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:26 a.m. No.3912190   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2263

>>3912174

No.

Shilling = paid fake posting

INORGANIC shilling = [ ] fake posting

 

"Shilling" is NEVER organic, in relation to honest posting. Hence you are led into redundancy by your fake reading. You can't fool people with this shit. People understood Q without the least difficulty, and the insistence on an absurd reading is quite conspicuous. Keep insisting on it.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:29 a.m. No.3912206   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2208 >>2235

>>3912192

The bot system has the ability to trot out more and more bots to cover for itself, but it has little else.

And the more bots that trot about, the more obvious it becomes that it is an INORGANIC situation. Shall you trot out more for us, idiotsystem?

Try to think. Try to grasp the bigger picture of the overall activity. Can you fool the people foroever? Try to think.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:30 a.m. No.3912213   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2218 >>2277

>>3912194

Just give up. There is no such thing as "organic shilling". Having fifteen bots a thread try to insist otherwise will only highlight the desperation of the system of botting to avoid outing. It's too late now. Try a different strategy. What can you do? Try to think.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:31 a.m. No.3912221   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2226 >>2250

>>3912208

Of course I am. Turing test me. Why won't you?

 

If you attack me for calling out the bot system by calling me a bot, then fail to try to Turing test me, would you have been better off just not posting in the first place, bot? Think about it. Try.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:36 a.m. No.3912242   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2245 >>2256 >>2325

>>3912233

shilling = inorganic posting

inorganic shilling = inorganic posting by inorganic "people"

Look, idiotsystemโ€“ even the mainstream accepts that bots post on internet boards. This is your own narrative! Surely you understand that this absurd attempt to contravene the English language to cover your own outing can only backfire. Think about it. You can't win. Just accept reality.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:38 a.m. No.3912255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2258 >>2259 >>2282

>>3912245

That was already answered. What strategic purpose does posting my own anti-bot meme serve? Does this make me look less you human and me look like a bot? Explain for the people how. You won't because you can't, and so what have you accomplished? Try to think, idiotsystem.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:41 a.m. No.3912269   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2282

>>3912263

LOL, shut up idiotbot. Shilling is paid by definition.

 

Internet shill definition

An Internet shill is someone who promotes something or someone online for pay without divulging that they are associated with the entity they shill for.

Anonymous ID: c50533 Nov. 15, 2018, 5:45 a.m. No.3912296   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2299 >>2414

>>3912277

It is absolutely preposterous to think Soros would pay people to act like bots when the implementation of actual AI is clearly quite far along. LOL

Meanwhile, I have seen hundreds of "shills" fail Turing tests.

But please, keep prosecuting this line of reasoning. ROFL