>>3921491 (lb)

I believe it will continue the way it currently is. The best matches I've found came after Q clued us in to:

[Next week]

[Next week]

[Next week]

The pic attached is an illustration of how you'd read the clock based on that revelation. Consider that 11/17 is the target date. You would put three "Next weeks" between the dates and land on 03/22. Thus, you'd look at 03/22 for the most relevant posts.

This isn't the best example since there were no posts on 03/22, but I hope you get the idea.

>>3921696

I 'preciate the 'preciation, anon.

>>3921704

LOL! Great way to illustrate your point, anon.

Carry on, Patriots, and God bless.