My bad, I pasted a post in the thread, not the thread itself.
Should be:
Proofs of Q's Validity >>3921289
Thank you!
Yo king of a dunghill, you can edit out the copy and paste's I did to meet the char. count req.
Thanks champ.
No I see what Q was pointing out re: the importance of having a proofs thread front and center. It's for the New Eyes that reach this board!
I don't care how much other work you do if you can't do the basics here kid.
And you deleted it. Wow.
I don't care what images are there AS LONG AS WE HAVE A STICKY WITH OUR GREAT PROOFS.
It's quite literally Q's exact words
Just what the hell is wrong with you 2bit?
You see what I post, it's all for the movement, yet you still treat me like the enemy.
Are you happy with that stick up your ass?
Yeah real great showcase for new eyes.
I just copied the seed of the other thread so we can have one Stickied you walking disappointment.
You always end up hurting our movement instead of helping it. I wonder why that is.
You'll die locked up while you wait, sweety~
So I'm just pointing out we don't have something that Q has explicitly asked for.
>gets attacked by everyone
If any of you were ever looking for a barometer of comp'dness…
Go ahead and show my post history.
Show them how much an 'enemy' I really am.
I'm not
God, I don't even know how you'd live with yourself if you admitted your side.
No, do it right, post the whole thing like you normally do instead of cherry picking posts.
Go ahead, I want to see this post in there.
>Me and my king-of-a-dunghill sidekick are so jelly that they deleted a literal recreation of the old thread for an extremely old and outdated one.
so work, much patriot.
Why did dunghill unsticky it, anyway?
You are an expert of maintaining plausible deniability.
Well done, no one can tell if you're a disappointing coward or a well placed asset.
How's that for history, sweety~
And I still seriously want to know what I wrote just before those posts.
It was about bait re: the elections, I think :\