Anonymous ID: 5dd046 Nov. 15, 2018, 9:30 p.m. No.3922900   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2924

>>3922807

ALL except Gold standard. At this stage thatโ€™s absolutely retarded. Who owns the gold (say 90%) and defacto controls the price, liquidity, and availability (not the People). Tying our money to it 1:1 would kill our economy and we would have more control over it but not enough.

 

But if you change to sound money, like Lincoln did the green backs instead of debtors notes controlled by private company. Then all of the above.

Anonymous ID: 5dd046 Nov. 15, 2018, 9:36 p.m. No.3922942   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2985

>>3922924

Fair. Possibly reconsider. But I think there are ways to do it that can be almost as strong and more flexible.

 

My point was that if the ((bankers)) have a massive stake in the gold market, they could def facto manipulate our currency, credit, liquidity. So what you stated would be essential if US would even consider the GS

Anonymous ID: 5dd046 Nov. 15, 2018, 9:40 p.m. No.3922981   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

So youโ€™re saying Patton is Trump from the past before John Trump met Tesla and leapt forward into the future to become Julian Assange? Is that right?

 

Ghostwriting an article for Mike Rothschild and want to make sure Iโ€™m accurate. Thanks!