>>392256

>What if his online 'friends' are shown to be clowns?

VERY plausible, maybe not all of his online friends, but the ones egging him on and cosigning his delusions, would be highly suspect. Accounts deleted soon before the triggering also.

>But who at the FBI 'investigated' this Youtube comment?

Watched an MSM cover on this earlier sounded very much like a CYA situation ("um, yeah, we did look into it, but he had freedom of speech so..."). Wouldn't be far-fetched to say that they used their usual entrapment if not to have him actually carry out the act, to make sure that he could be the patsy once it was committed.

>>392336

The illusion of taking action AFTER the fact. Same old program, make normies "feel" safer let the hype die down after a while, then back to business as usual, triggering the ones they want to make the headlines