Anonymous ID: df854d Nov. 16, 2018, 9:09 a.m. No.3927152   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This could be interesting:

"A federal judge has ordered Hillary Clinton to respond to further questions, under oath, about her private email server…

Following a lengthy Wednesday court hearing, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (who is also presiding over fmr. National Security adviser Michael Flynn's case), ruled that Clinton has 30 days to answer two additional questions about her controversial email system in response to a lawsuit from Judicial Watch."

 

Hillary must answer the following questions by December 17 (via Judicial Watch)

"Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational."

"During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts."

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-16/hillary-clinton-ordered-answer-additional-questions-under-oath-about-private-email

Anonymous ID: df854d Nov. 16, 2018, 9:38 a.m. No.3927470   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7501

>>3927304

I really don't see why everyone here is so obsessed with POTUS publicly acknowledging Q. In my view it would be extremely counterproductive. POTUS needs to stay "above" anything that could be perceived as a "conspiracy theory", or even just too far right. He has enough Never Trumper, leftist, and media resistance to deal with every day, and acknowledging Q would surely add to the daily shit storm.