>>3927471 (last bread)
>So there is NO 1A right to enter the WH?
!st A deals with freedom of the press, as well. Could mean press has no right to be at WH, and are only invited guests, soon to be invited guests.
>and are only invited guests, soon to be invited guests.
I fucked that up. Should be:
and are only invited guests, soon to be UNinvited guests.
Just saw the part where da judge says Trump has the right to keep them all out. No constitutional grounds to have to be there. Just make sure all the i are dotted and the t's are crossed on the procedure for removal.
>It was the 4th amendment right. "to due process" that was sited, not the 1st.
Yeah. give him his say, then make sure to dot all the i's and cross all the T's on document that removes him (due process). Or just kick all of them out. Freedom of the press doesn't mean they have to be stationed at the White House.
Sarah's talking about the 1st amendment, which the judge says isn't an issue. Shot across the bow.
Reporters really need to start policing their own or risk having all their asses end up out on the street, IMO.