>>3928533 (pb)
Nah. We're here.
Maybe shitposting and not being very useful, you are correct. It's interesting to see what happens and who shows up.
We ARE here, tho. :)
>>3928533 (pb)
Nah. We're here.
Maybe shitposting and not being very useful, you are correct. It's interesting to see what happens and who shows up.
We ARE here, tho. :)
Or he may actually be a danger to everyone on this planet?
She always wears gloves. I have red gloves and I definitely do NOT eat babies, etc.
Funny how survivors are able to, you know, survive.
And FFS: Attorneys do the questioning - not the accused.
(I'm saying I agree with you.)
Eh. It may be the reason women live longer than men. Who knows?
What is Trump (or anyone) supposed to do? Run after every "muh feelz" anon (US citizen or not) and pat their hand until they feel better? God, I would hope that's not anyone's strategy. Stay or go. It's on the individual and anyone who says otherwise is a liar with an agenda that should probably be questioned.
wtf is wrong with you?
"We" who, Kemosabe?
If the language of acknowledging someone else's work is a threat to anyone, welp. Sucks to be you. Can't even say I'm sorry for thinking that.