I am hoping that any prosecution of Assange will be in name only and that the DOJ sets out with the intention of losing the case. Think about it? Much of the incriminating evidence that Wikileaks holds on Podesta Clinton etal. has already been published. That is the nature of Wikileaks. Transparancy. It is not of their nature to have been holding back reams of information they haven't already made publicly available. Surely the only reason you even need physical custody of Assange is to question him about SOURCES of informtion, not content, and he is going to be disinclined to provide too much in that regard I'd suspect. Mind you, he did all but doxx Seth Rich as the source of the Dem documents, and was vocal about his death being highly suspicious. So he might agree in some sort of a plea deal to reveal that particular source once convinced that siding with Trump is really siding with the Angels. A conclusion i suspecg he's already reached, so he may not even need to be convinced. Thus all the CONTENT could be publicly aired, the single most important SOURCE (in terms of POTUS concerns re. the non existent Russian Hacking narrative) would be revealed. And a nice deal struck with assange wherevpby the poor bugger may yet see the light of day again inthis lifetime…