Anonymous ID: 6891dd Nov. 16, 2018, 12:32 p.m. No.3929703   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9858 >>9903

>>3929579

 

there is an argument that a whole bunch of Dems cheated to win House seats, and that we'll get em, and they won't be seated, or will be removed, and this could all happen under 2 years. This is just an argument that some have been making.

Anonymous ID: 6891dd Nov. 16, 2018, 12:36 p.m. No.3929751   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3929699

 

what would be the reason for posting about John Tower in 1989?

 

Do you think that the numbers 53-47 have some numerological significance?

 

Don't you think that occam's should apply to 53-47?

Anonymous ID: 6891dd Nov. 16, 2018, 12:55 p.m. No.3930001   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0117

>>3929806

 

The elections are 2 years away.

 

We're either going to get Drain The Swamp and Lock Her Up, or we're not.

 

We're all here because Q said, over a year ago, that arrests are right around the corner. And we're sitting here waiting for justice.

 

Now, if we get those arrests, trials, jail terms and hangings, or some of those things, the election in 2020 will look much different than if those things don't happen.

 

The rest of the stuff you're talking about will be mostly inconsequential if we get arrests, trials, jail, etc.

 

And all that other stuff that Q says is going to happen - if that happens, we're good. If it turns out, in November 2020, that Q was largely full of it, or Trump tries and fails miserably, the GOP might have problems in the voting booth.

Anonymous ID: 6891dd Nov. 16, 2018, 1 p.m. No.3930072   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3930004

 

It's called a guess. I think a pollster has the power to foresee.

 

I mean, really. What kind of Nostradamus could possibly predict that the GOP would pick up 2 seats in the Senate? There was definitely an over 10% chance of that specific outcome.

 

do they gamble in Vegas on the outcome of races? 53-47 would have been less than 10-1 odds. Not some crazy pick. Really.