>>3936198 baker from lb here. let me know if you need to handoff. i was experiencing a bit of lag too but it wasn't that bad
>>3936254 this may be stupid but
>>3936310 anon, what did you mean by the best stuff very rarely shows up in notables? just wondering
and the reason we (i) put msm articles in notables is bc like another anon said, sometimes you have to find the golden nuggets in the pile of shit. also gotta know what the enemy is saying. rn the msm narrative is still the narrative that matters and the one that's winning so we have to know what they tell the world, even if it runs counter to what Q tells the world aka the truth. we may be winning for real but we have yet to conquer msm so i feel like it's always relevant
but maybe we could be more open to other sources?
>>3936378 thanks anon. i'm glad there's always someone here to keep this thing going.
i don't think many anons will understand your methods of reducing
this all makes sense to me
except for the part where you added 38 (NYSE close) but not .76 (13 or 4?) and S&P is incomplete as well..but the rest checks out
>>3936761 i understand what you're saying anon. i think it really just is a matter of limited time. but i do hope if anons really think something is notable that they nominate it..support other anons and help bakers/everyone really! i rarely leave something out if 1 or 2 anons think its notable unless it's obviously crap but that's just me
>>3936915 this should be our motto..kinda like a "we see everything"
>>3936928 anons of q research are amazing people. who hurt u grl
>>3936938 step 1, first step
high IQ repost next bread
dude i agreed with you.. i think it's notable
and was laughing at people who didn't get it..