Anonymous ID: f92960 Nov. 17, 2018, 5:37 a.m. No.3938736   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8770 >>9037

>>3938636

really? please provide the sauce for that.

what I remember is that Q didn't want to filter posters to the board.

Q didn't say anything about filtering the shills.

yes they can post (free speech)

no, we don't need to be subjected to their operant conditioning (filter as necessary).

Anonymous ID: f92960 Nov. 17, 2018, 5:40 a.m. No.3938759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3938693

fishing for 'feels' to make your slam pieces against Q seem more credible?

any sample you collect in this way is anecdotal and invalid.

notice how desparate these shills are to 'catagorize' anons 'feels'

Anonymous ID: f92960 Nov. 17, 2018, 6:32 a.m. No.3939079   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9136

>>3938948

re>>3939037

>(You)

no filter at the input. Anything can be input.

that is what he meant.

when viewing did he say 'no filters'?

 

freedom means that the information is allowed to be entered onto the board.

 

freedom also means that if we don't want to view the degenerate subliminal crap from a shillposter, we don't need to do it.

 

the positioning of the filter determines its effect.

 

in one case it's a filter of teh BO, in another it's your own filter.

 

Q, did you want to clarify?

if gore-fag is here do we really not filter it while viewing?

Anonymous ID: f92960 Nov. 17, 2018, 6:47 a.m. No.3939189   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3939167

please also note shills saying 'no filter' for the server means no filter for the browser.

 

I submit that when Q meant 'no filters' Q was discussing the input.

shills say it means filtering the view.

 

if we can't filter the view then we wouldn't even be able to search the bread for all posts of the same id.