>>393567

Not quite. When becoming an inhabitant of one jurisdiction you give up inhabitantcy in the other.

>>393583

I am in here nearly everyday but spend a lot of time catching up. That's impossible sometimes so just find all the Q posts and come up to speed that way. Mind you I probably miss a huge amount of good info. Trying to figure out a way for others to catch up without spending hours doing so….

393766

BINGO!!!!

This Anon can read for content!!

>>393766

BINGO!!!!

This Anon can read for content!!

(Had to repost because the reference post was not showing correctly)

>>394009

It depends on which Constitution you are talking about - there are three of them in the National Archives. ….. you have to be a lawyer to view them and you can't take in any writing implements or recording devices when doing so. I wonder why????

>>394108

THIS ANON GETS IT

>>394154

Thanks for that.

>>394213

You answer is precisely the reason why this Article is misunderstood and/or not applied.

>>394213

One other thing, the word Inhabitant is used in this section

NOT

the word resident.

READ for CONTENT

>>394306

I once shook the hand of someone who was a top options trader at the London Stock Exchange. I was shocked at how 'limp' and weird it felt. The handshake was very similar to the one in the photo in this post.

Pretty ugly experience.

>>394321

Exactly why you

don't get it

>>394359

Don't bother with answering >>394372 or >>394321 . They get legal terms confused and/or mixed up. The founding fathers were very precise in the stuff they were saying. Which is why the word residency was

NOT

used.