Should we start a separate thread for Q-Proofs?

>>394124

I thought so - some anon told me Q was first, and no one corrected him. Good catch.

>>394330

Fair points - I'm just trying to be responsive to Q's post saying we should "BUILD PROOFS".

I agree that the press sharing talking points is no smoking gun, but Q mentioning JP Barlow 10 days before he died is pretty PROOF positive

>>394440

Completely agree. Any volunteers for starting a Q-Proofs thread?

>>394600

Happy to help with this