>>3939493 (lb)

You know, it's interesting when you get to see the evidence so well presented; so I think this post should get a secondary honorable mention.

I remember frequenting /pol/ on halfchan last year, before Q came into the picture, and I could see this shit happening right in front of my face. And I damned near fell for that shit.

/pol/'s a shitshow either way, but when it went hardcore Nazism, I'll be the first to admit that I damned near fell for it… It wasn't that I didn't think something was wrong, I just didn't anticipate the idea that there would be so many personalities at play.

You had your bitter angry bots that just spewed hatred from every orifice, then you had your "happy" bots that had these almost jovial, but still steered in the same line of thinking, to these idiotic bots that shitposted at every opportunity, but again, steered into the same narrative.

This kind of got me thinking though, I wonder if these bots have a flaw. I'm not talking about the whole, "Well, if you know what to look for you can ID filter them" kind of thing, I mean really fuck with them internally. Stack overflow, memory overflow? Could we get them to say/do things that clearly identify them beyond a reasonable doubt?

I've watched AGDQ segments where hackers were able to hack a GB game running on a Super Gameboy, to hack into the Super Gameboy, to hack into the NES, and run arbitrary code on the SNES. If it accepts input, it can be hacked.

Not suggesting this would be a particularly good use of our time, just a passing thought…