MIDTERMS Opinion

1) the midterms were in not as bad for the GOP as the uniparty/media expected.

2) Many of those that lost or retired were at the least anti-Trump. Many were full nevertrumpers.

3) Now much has been made about all retirements. But if you look at the avg. It was an avg year. 23 GOP house members retired, 3 gop senators. Which is avg.

4) The media lumped the 13 who ran for higher office in with the total to give a certain impression. Ask yourself why.

5) Final counts aren't available yet but it appears the Dems will have about a 30 seat majority. This is less than what the GOP had last year and if Pelosi is to win the speaker slot it may take Trump's help. (Don't discount this)

6) In the Senate, as of now it appears that the gop will be +3 . Flipping FL, MO, ND, and IN while losing NV and AZ. This was really unexpected by the uniparty/media. As Kavanaugh showed they really expected up to that point to flip the Senate to the Dem side.

7) Now, I didn't follow every campaign, but from what I've been able to research those that lost like McSally and numerous Gop house incumbents ran at best lackluster campaigns and even with the lackluster campaigns most of those lost races were much closer than expected.

8) Some even had to cheat to win from all accounts.

9) So, from all available evidence, facts and figures. It's clear that Trump blunted the uniparty's schemes with his rallies. I shudder to think what could have been if Trump didn't campaign.

10) It's also clear, at least to me, that many of those who retired or ran lackluster campaigns did so at the uniparty's urging or knowing that the "fix" was in. There was honest surprise and disbelief that Trump did so well in the mid terms.

11) The after action by the media pushing the narrative of "muh we are all doomed" backs up this thought. There was a blue wave it was matched by Trump's wave. I've called this possiblity, destructive interference, after the physics term used to describe wave interaction.

12) The media and uniparty were honestly shocked and dismayed at the disappointing results of the mid terms. They still are. They believed that the Trump base was a small minority. They have been disabused of that stupid notion.

13) They really thought that Trump's base was a small minority. The thinking went that all they had to do was mobilize their base, open up battle ground districts/states via retirements and run lackluster campaigns and they would create a landslide win that would end Trump.

14) They were wrong.

15) Not just slightly wrong completely wrong.

16) They were shown beyond a doubt that The Trump coalition is not a small majority and if not for a couple votes( ~30,000 total out of +100 million) they would still not have the House.

17) The expected landslide became a whimper. They are shook. The only unexpected thing that occurred that has helped the uniparty is the full fledged battered conservative syndrome displayed after the results. The media used that to great effect to cover their stunning defeat.

18) As more results roll in and the "muh we are all doomed" crowd stops having the vapors, I think more and more people will understand what a great victory Trump had in the mid terms.

For a few weeks I’ve been wondering about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and just how she emerged as a politico.

Her path to Washington is shocking, at the very least. My first question was: What were her campaign positions BEFORE she became a national figure?

So I went to her campaign website and took that web address and looked through the internet archive. When I went back to 2017, it was not her website, it belonged to the group "Brand New Congress."

Here's what the web address looks like now:

https://ocasio2018.com/splash

Here's what the same web address looked like in late 2017:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjXBrVFXoAAdOiG.jpg

What's “Brand New Congress?” BNC is a group of Bernie Sanders staffers who got together, decided to make the 2018 midterms all about Bernie policies by taking his ideas & finding 400 Bernie carbon copies to dump into Congressional & other races, creating a 400 headed Bernie.

Watch Rachel Maddow explain and discuss with the co-founder of Brand New Congress, Saikat Chakrabarti.

I know, I know, Rachel Maddow. But if you want to learn about the left, you have to actually watch and listen to them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il2iQfBm4zo

The idea is that BNC will select candidates that must sign onto the Bernie Sanders plan and “bi partisan issues” such as:

Income Inequality, Climate Change, Mass Incarceration, Get money out of politics.

Keep Income Inequality & geting $ out of politics in mind for later.

Here’s the official current policy page that ALL of their candidates have signed onto: brandnewcongress.org/policy/

Fixing the Economy, Medicare for All, Tax Reform, Foreign Policy, Women’s Rights, CJ Reform, Voting Rights, LGBTQIA Rights, Immigration Reform, Environmental & Renewable Energy, Getting $ out of Politics, Veterans Rights, Education, Racial Justice, Online Freedom.

They obviously take the far far left approach on every issue.

If you follow the bouncing ball, Saikat Chakrabarti- the BNC guy talking with Maddow- also is an Exec Director of an affiliated organization, “Justice Democrats.” The Justice Democrats PAC and the Brand New Congress organization are essentially inseparable.

THIS IS WHERE IT GETS REALLY WEIRD.

“Justice Democrats” is a PAC co-founded by Cenk Uygur, the far lefty that used to be on MSNBC and eventually started a Youtube blog called TYT (The Young Turks). Yeah, this guy→That’s right. The person behind the curtain that put Alexandria Osasio-Cortez into that national spotlight is Cenk Uygur.

Here’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez talking to The Young Turks & Cent Uygur about how Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats pursued her to run for Congress. (10 minute mark)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7SIHsPWYEs

The entire interview is amazing, from Cenk interviewing her and pretending he had nothing to do with her candidacy to her making a joke about being in a bar and the calling out for naked models over the microphone.

Notice Cenk laughing at the sexism.

So what’s going on with Cenk and Justice Democrats? In late 2017 he was forced out of his own organization. Apparently Cenk has a sexist streak in him and documented it in some older blog posts Joy Reid style.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kczCNvJYlxk

Here’s one of the posts:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020607165341/http://www.youngturk.com:80/newpage41.htm

I particularly like the part where he explains that when he wrote those posts, he was a different guy. He was a conservative.

Here’s another post: Cenk’s rules of dating.

https://web.archive.org/web/20020319052056/http://www.youngturk.com:80/rulesof.htm

Here’s another lovely post about Cenk and The Young Turks Sr. VP David Koller stopping at a gas station and meeting 14-16 year old “whores in training.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20051223065712/http://www.youngturk.com:80/Articles/xcountry1.htm

But Cenk’s a changed man now. He's not a sexist. He’s “woke.”

And don’t forget the chuckle in the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez video about the naked models.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjXHXnNWwAApmdX.jpg

Yeah, he’s woke alright. He’s woke but he’s not broke. Let’s see how he feels about corporate money and politics.

His organization The Young Turks is partially funded by the Media Consortium, a Soros entity.

https://www.themediaconsortium.org/member-directory

More about the Media Consortium and Soros:

https://www.mrc.org/commentary/soros-funded-lefty-media-reach-more-300-million-every-month

But wait, there’s more.

A quick search on Cenk’s net worth put him in the $18-22m range after taking venture capital money. Yes. He took "vulture capital" money.

https://www.thesquander.com/cenk-uygur-net-worth-2017

So there you have it. In a nutshell, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s political career was spawned by Cenk Uygur, who’s history is sexism & venture capital money, in an attempt to put 400 Bernie Sanders carbon copies into our political system and move the Dems far far left.