>>3942028

>Nah.. because then the world wouldn't revolve around you…

>

>Amirite?

nope. it seems to this anon that the he is pretty much at the center of the universe and yes, i will have another pan-galactic gargle blaster, thanks.

>>3942193

>How come FAKEQ's posts aren't deleted, but patriots' posts are?

maybe it has something to do with the vertical test turing test stuff. no idea whether or not ai can deal with vertical text but if they cannot i suspect that it would be an input (perception and senses) level problem and nothing to do with actual personhood or not. but what does it matter? any anon structurally replying to me with vertical text can expect that this non-ai person is going to ignore them.

>>3942200

>lol wut?

your age, or lack thereof is showing. Zaphod Beeblebrox is all you need to know. and don't forget to bring a fucking towel.

>>3942271

>>3942274

works every time. a drink, a towel and then we can all ignore the religious slide and get back to work. (am a biblefag myself but do get tired of non-cabal connected religious meanderings).

>>3942337

>>3942286

wtf fuck freddy….that was actually good…..and your 33s win as well…..fuckin speechless i am

>>3942396

>"I fear the man of a single book"

>

>~St. Thomas Aquinas

>

>Expand your thinking.

good thing the bible isnt a single book then. and i highly doubt that you're going to find support for whatever half-baked shit you're shilling in aquinas. not every book written in the period that claims to be a gospel is a gospel. make an intelligent fucking argument or something.

>>3942469

>So you've never read other than the 66 books of the Bible, in learning the Word of God? If you've read say, the Gospel of Thomas, then why do you call it a farce. If you haven't read it/them, who told you not to read them?

read all of it (all of the ante-nicean literature including all of the so-called psuedo-texts - i have them on my shelf, along with a shitload of aquinas etc…). and much more. no one tells me what to read or not read unless they are paying. and then they can pay me to read stuff. there is no price i would accept in exchange for agreeing not to read something. this does not, however, imply that i will read anything.

i do not say that the gospel of thomas is a farce. i say that your presentation of whatever it is you are trying to sell is a farce. and the idea that it is prima facia obvious that the gospel of thomas deserves the same respect as the canon or the apocrypha is just stupid.