>>3942360 (LB)

>>3942368 (LB)

>How is she still alive, idk

Because she doesn't know what she's talking about.

You can't make a laser from space that can do this. It's not physically possible. A orbital laser would basically be a orbital telescope in reverse. And orbital telescopes are diffraction limited. The ratio between wavelength and aperture diameter determines the hard limit of how tight the output beam can possibly be. A larger aperture can maintain a tighter beam, but would obviously also mean a less concentrated beam for a given amount of power. So there is a limit to how small the laser spot on the ground can possibly be. And this is before we start talking about atmospheric distortion and dust/smoke in the air. To ignite leaves and trees under a spot a couple meters in diameter the satellite would have to output MEGAWATTS. That laser will not fit on a rocket and cannot be powered by any solar array that could have gone unnoticed all this time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction-limited_system

https://skullsinthestars.com/2012/06/13/how-well-can-the-government-spy-on-us-via-satellite/

There, now I hope I've put this to bed once and for all.

>>3942605

See:

>>3942659

>>3942686

>How about a mirror directing the sun?

Same physics apply. Actually, it's harder to do it that way because the Sun's rays are not all parallel. And such a mirror would be quite conspicuous.

>>3942712

Poorly phrased headline, but notable.

Here is the sauce's sauce, the Daily Caller.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/16/arizona-gop-election-audits/

>>3942729

News piece from Oct 2017 about lasers being developed to shoot down missiles.

>>3942972

Don't bother clicking. It's AIM.

>>3943014

>Any connection to the photo of the US sub with the Jolly Roger flying?

I don't think so. The USS Carter was operating in the Pacific in Sept 2017 when it returned flying that flag. It's suspected 'round these parts that it had something to do with N Korea suddenly changing their tone. The Argentinian sub went missing in the Atlantic in Nov 2017.

>>3943184

>>3943173

Think of how much power in microwave energy would be required to have the effects that people are attributing to this.

The vehicle mounted crowd-control system output 100,000 watts and are only moderately discomforting (feels "like a hot oven opening up").

How big and heavy do you think an emitter would have to be to burn away trees and utility poles? How big out the power generator be?

Think about it.

>>3943269

Forgot vid.