>>3942642

Spacefag here,

Posted last bread but wanted to get this out again.

This was not caused by a space-based weapon—that I know. I won’t elaborate too much but just know that a DEW or chemo/electro/optical device capable of starting ground fires from space would be impossible to hide from the military/private sector. Also those photos going around of visible lasers etc are fake.

I am not a firefag, but there does appear to be serious fuckery going on with how the fires started and spread.

I cannot help much with these fires but I can say with solid confidence this is not a space-based weapon.

>>3942788

Could be drone with perhaps a chemical sprayed on the ground to help things along. I still like the “smart-meter” electric company idea going around.

A drone capable of starting large fires without help is low probability. I could see a drone igniting something coated in an accelerant if some sort.