>>3942729 Fox news report on government's use of laser weapons
>>3942605 Video: Plan to Burn up Northern California Disclosed
Baker, you disappoint me.
^^^^^^^^^
Those leaves look pretty charred.
It's more complicated than that.
(Yeah, it HuffPo. But it's the best vid I could find on the topic)
Sure. But this is inside a microwave-reflective box. Think of the wattage that would be needed to cook the beams inside a bridge out in the open. Megawatts, minimum. The most powerful portable transmitter ever created. It would not be something you could move and use around covertly.
No. Just no.
You can get lasers much more powerful than 5mW.
If lasers had anything to do with starting these fires it would have been an infrared version of something like this (vid related) out the window of a car.
>Don't you think it would have been easier to start those fires using MS-13 or some other "wetworks" org?
Yeah. If it wasn't downed powerlines then it was a low lever henchman driving around lighting many small fires using low-tech methods. The stuff about satellite lasers or gajillion watt microwave beams is disinfo to make us look in the wrong places and make everyone who questions the natural explanation get on a bandwagon that makes them look crazy to normies.
I think that the most low-tech theory is the most likely.
*low-level