? You mean, "why did the flammable materials in this truck cab catch fire when a hot ember landed on them?"
Really? Is this not obvious?
? You mean, "why did the flammable materials in this truck cab catch fire when a hot ember landed on them?"
Really? Is this not obvious?
What little metal is in a car/truck frame is paper thin. Not like a microwave, like just a fire. Seriously, when was the last time you bought a new car?
So, you're saying you have actual hard evidence of that… or are you saying you're just winging it and guessing?
Asking for a fren.
Evidence of what you just claimed they're doing. You can't be so stupid you didn't understand that question.. or are you?
Wait, you're saying you can SEE THE CHEMICALS and know what's there? Wow, so you have the ability to perform spectroscopy with your eyes? HORY SHEET!
That's not what I asked… of course they do cloud seeding, are you that fucking retarded? Aluminum oxide isn't harmful.
Do you have evidence the do the shit claimed in that post I was replying to you illiterate dumbass?
Unnatural based on what? You're already claiming you know what's in these trails chemically, which indicates you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. You have no basis to claim "unnatural," because you simply don't know. You dumb motherfuckers shit all over these breads making all of us look like fucking retards because you're too fucking stupid to do a little fucking research.
Tell me what's in those so-called "chemtrails," and tell me how you know. Tell me what basis you have to call them unnatural.
Until then, STFU, and GKYS for being so fucking stupid.
My pet pig, on the other hand…
In other words, because someone else agrees with your silly nonsense, it must be true? I said hard evidence… you stop being a dumbass, I stop being a dick, fair trade?
She said "oh my gosh."
Well hell, that sells it for me. Hell, she even used technical terminology like "warped and stuff."
News flash: when the physical world doesn't behave the way you think it should behave, more often than not, it's because you don't understand the physical world very well. At the very least, it's because you don't understand it as well as you think you do. The narrator in this video, is exhibit #1.
I've read it, I've listened to it, you dumbfucks don't know what you're talking about. You're literally the stupidest anons I've encountered since the flat earthers were running amok. It's like a plague of stupid, and you guys are all carriers. At some point, maybe you should do some research, too.
Of course it has been… drive through the CO mountains some day. It's eye opening.
Oh my god. Really? Are you still in kindergarten? Holy fuck. The stupid just took off for stupidsville.
The point, of course, is that these people keep claiming because THEY haven't seen things like this before, it must be out of the ordinary.
This is the classical definition of the anecdotal evidence fallacy. People assume that either what they have seen is the truth for everything, or the converse, what they haven't seen is likewise the truth for everything.
I've seen exactly what she says is abnormal. It's not. It's all over Colorado. Obviously she isn't just weak, she's extrapolating her beliefs into some physical reality that simply isn't true. And anons are falling for it.
Really? Fuck… I always liked MJ, though the whole "AIDS without symboms of AIDS" thing was suspicious…