>>3949611

>So tell me how con-artists like goode and narcissistic wilcock-in-the-mouth can parade around doing "disclosure fests" talking about the HIGHEST classified material and STILL live to tell about it?

So does that mean that ANYBODY, that has an outspoken opinion MUST be silenced by death? Is that the ONLY outcome for such people, and if they're not dead then they are fake?

> WE ANONS don't BUY into unfounded claims of blue chicken aliens without EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

So does that mean YOU speak for all Anons here? And what EMPIRICAL evidence do you have that Q is really who they say they are?

>>3949696

Second photo is years old. Do reverse image search of alpha.

>>3949990

You wrote, in your post, that "…talking about the HIGHEST classified material and STILL live to tell about?" Therefore, you infer that they would not be alive to talk about it, ergo, being dead.

HAHA, and your constant use of chan language in your posts shows the fact that you are a needy person in search for acceptance from others, on their terms, i.e. using other peoples language. You can't form an argument using your own thoughts or words.

The fact is, you DON'T speak for all Anons, no matter how hard you try. I am not sticking up for other people's views, just wondering why you feel the need to push your beliefs on other people. Why differing beliefs from yours should result, in your mind, for a person to not stay "alive".