>>3950185

Good to see you, P&L.

Way to get the kitchen back in order.

Kick ass, man.

>>3950245

Glad to have you.

Will be on standby for the better part of the afternoon, so just shout whenever you need.

Lurking for now.

>>3950321

Too much salt makes for bad bread, indeed.

That's a long haul - be sure to get plenty of rest.

Shout when you need, I'll be around then.

>>3950314

This is not a bad idea.

Would implement this myself, but it would be your decision, ultimately.

Thoughts?

>>3950388

"Comped Baker" ought to suffice.

>>3950368

No samefagging here.

Having seen the same material spammed for months, it makes no sense to call it Notable.

If you're of the genuine opinion that the Baker of that thread was indeed a genuine Anon, then so be it.

I'll leave it at that.

>>3950544

>sets a clear standard

This is demonstrably untrue.

"Standards" vary from Baker to Baker.

Would it be "standard" if a Baker openly misleads Anons, or spams the Notables with memes and bullshit?

In what way would such "discretion" "protect" anyone?

Moreover, shill Bakers have been kicked out of the kitchen in the past - is that no longer the case?

Why bother checking IP hashes and supervising the kitchen if any shill can fill the Notables with garbage, knowing that you'd openly back it regardless of what they said or did?

>>3950637

No need - nothing would be accomplished.

On Rusty's side of the argument re: accountability now, so that's something.

Have a good rest of the day.